Company name | Profile | Service categories | List of VAT taxpayers | REGON register | Legal form | PKD | Certifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Security Data access governance platform for Microsoft 365: permission monitoring, access change analytics, external sharing control and reporting that supports NIS2 compliance. | Core offering | Infrastructure Security Cloud Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| 4Ergo Cybersecurity integrator and IT outsourcing provider covering data protection, network security, infrastructure monitoring, backup and technology advisory. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| 4Prime IT security integrator that designs, deploys and maintains network, endpoint, cloud, email and application protection: NGFW, NDR, EDR and XDR, ZTNA, SASE and CSPM, DLP and DAM, PAM and MFA. It runs 24/7 managed detection and response (SOC360) and digital forensics after incidents. Application and infrastructure penetration tests, code reviews and configuration assessments are carried out by Afine, in which 4Prime is the majority shareholder. | Core offering | Infrastructure Security Cloud Security Data Protection Monitoring & SOC Penetration Testing & Audits | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Anzena Distributor and integrator of data protection technology: backup and disaster recovery, data loss prevention, privileged access management and security for IT and OT networks. | Part of the offering | Data Protection Infrastructure Security OT/ICS Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Apius Technologies Network integrator running a SOC and deploying network, endpoint, application, data and communication security, public cloud, container and SaaS security, DevSecOps, digital identity and OT cybersecurity, alongside its LAN, DC and SD-WAN business. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Cloud Security Data Protection Monitoring & SOC OT/ICS Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Arkanet IT security integrator from Katowice: antivirus and EDR-XDR, email and cloud protection, encryption, MDM, PAM, DLP, SIEM and SOAR, vulnerability detection, backup, UTM and firewall network security, plus industrial OT protection. | Core offering | Infrastructure Security Cloud Security Data Protection Monitoring & SOC OT/ICS Security Security Training & Awareness | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Artixen Protects web applications and CMS platforms through security audits, monitoring, WAF, backup, multi-factor authentication and the managed Artixen Protect service. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Asseco Data Systems (Certum) Asseco group company running Certum, a certification authority operating since 1998, issuing qualified electronic signatures, seals, timestamps and SSL certificates, next to its software lines for local government, education and HR. | Part of the offering | Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| AT Computers IT integrator from Swarzedz with a security line: antivirus and EDR, UTM firewall with antispam and VPN, backup, DLP, PAM, MDM, encryption, two-factor authentication and log collection, alongside servers, storage and its own warehouse software. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection Monitoring & SOC | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Atende IT integrator for the defence, telecom, energy and finance sectors offering ICT security audits, 24/7 monitoring, SIEM and SOAR, network protection, endpoint EDR, email and data security, next to its network integration and data centre business. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security GRC & Compliance Data Protection Monitoring & SOC | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Axence Vendor of Axence nVision, a platform for IT infrastructure monitoring, asset and user management, data loss prevention and network security control. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | ISO/IEC 27001 |
| BTC Developer of the eAuditor IT infrastructure management software, covering inventory, monitoring and the DLP and IAM security modules, vulnerability management and firewall control. It also offers RODOprotektor for GDPR compliance management and a whistleblowing system. | Part of the offering | Data Protection Infrastructure Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| CA Cybersecurity Analytics CA Cybersecurity Analytics is a Gdansk-based provider of cybersecurity and risk analytics services that combines expert knowledge with AI-driven automation. It helps organisations turn scattered data into a coherent, measurable risk model. The offer covers three proprietary solutions: UCM, which integrates assets, threats, vulnerabilities and safeguards; RAP, which analyses risk across assets, people, compliance, suppliers and data; and DDM, which supports data correlation and remediation planning. The company provides vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, data protection, network monitoring, incident response and ISMS automation. It supports compliance with NIS2, DORA, the AI Act and the Cyber Resilience Act. It also delivers AI projects, deploying models and governance solutions. A team with more than 20 years of experience serves clients in Poland, the United Kingdom, Germany and other countries. The first consultation is free of charge. | Core offering | GRC & Compliance Data Protection Infrastructure Security Penetration Testing & Audits Monitoring & SOC | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| CC Otwarte Systemy Komputerowe IT systems integrator deploying network security solutions, including Internet perimeter protection, 2FA access control, PAM, endpoint protection and DLP systems. It performs security audits of web and mobile applications and of IT and OT infrastructure, alongside systems integration and software development. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection Penetration Testing & Audits OT/ICS Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Cloudica Cloudica is an IT services provider working with Azure, Microsoft 365, cloud migrations, infrastructure and IT outsourcing. Its separate cybersecurity offering includes security audits, cloud environment protection, endpoint protection, user access control and DLP deployments. | Part of the offering | Penetration Testing & Audits Cloud Security Infrastructure Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Cryptomage Maker of Cryptomage Cyber Eye, an NDR probe applying AI to network traffic analysis to detect threats and anomalies in IT and OT networks, including personal data leaks. | Core offering | Monitoring & SOC OT/ICS Security Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Cyber Security Lab CSL Software (Cyber Security Lab) is a software house based in Zielona Gora that builds applications and systems for businesses and the public sector. As separate services it implements cryptography, including end-to-end encryption and zero-knowledge proofs, and deploys two-factor authentication. | Part of the offering | Data Protection Infrastructure Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| DCD-SEMI IP core provider and system-on-chip design house whose CryptOne cryptographic system hardens ASIC and FPGA designs against physical and side-channel attacks in embedded systems. | Part of the offering | Data Protection | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Deloitte Cybersecurity practice within the Deloitte advisory firm: NIS2, DORA and GDPR compliance, SOC build and run, MXDR, threat intelligence, cloud and OT/ICS security, data protection and Zero Trust architecture. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security GRC & Compliance Cloud Security Data Protection Monitoring & SOC OT/ICS Security | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | |
| Direct IT IT outsourcing and support provider that also deploys EDR, network security with segmentation and UTM/NG, DLP systems, vulnerability analysis and phishing tests. It helps organizations assess KSC/NIS2 obligations and prepare compliance documentation, and builds backup and disaster recovery systems. | Part of the offering | Infrastructure Security Data Protection Security Training & Awareness GRC & Compliance | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... | Loading... |
DLP and encryption in practice - how the work runs
Data protection work starts by establishing which records you hold and where they sit, and only then adds rules that limit how those records leave the company. That order runs against instinct, and reversing it is what derails a rollout. Without classification the tooling blocks ordinary work, people route around it, and internal IT ends up handling complaints instead of real alerts. The provider maps repositories, mailboxes and shared drives, marks the sensitive sets, and then brings exit channels under control: mail, browser uploads, cloud drives, removable media and chat apps.
The category reaches further than DLP alone. It covers inventory and classification of data sets, encryption at rest and in transit, key management in a cloud KMS or a hardware security module, tokenisation, and pseudonymised copies for test environments. The work leaves behind rules matched to the way documents really move, a classification report pointing at places where records sit with no business reason, a key management policy, and a written path for handling a personal data breach.
Cost and schedule follow the number of endpoints and channels in scope, the number of source systems to connect, the volume of data to scan, and whether keys stay in a managed cloud service or in dedicated hardware. The engagement model shifts the figure as well, since delivery and setup price differently from a service that keeps tuning rules and clearing user exceptions. Work tends to fall into one order: scoping workshop, classification, monitoring without blocking, tuning, and enforcement at the very end.
When to act on data classification and protection
- A leaver took a copy of the customer database and you cannot reconstruct what was copied or which channel carried it.
- Teams move working files onto personal cloud drives and chat apps, and internal IT has no visibility into that traffic.
- An enterprise customer or a tender requires encryption at rest and documented key management before the contract can be signed.
- Copies of the production database with personal data land in test environments without pseudonymisation and without narrowed access.
- A reported breach forced you to scope the leak, and nobody in the company could say where the sensitive records were stored.
What to check before picking a data protection provider
- Ask for a walkthrough of a deployment at similar scale: how many rules survived tuning, and who maintained them afterwards.
- Check which channels the tooling genuinely covers: mail, browser uploads, removable media, chat apps, cloud drives and non Windows workstations.
- Establish who performs classification: the provider, with its own tooling and workshops with your teams, or you, handing over a finished list.
- Settle who holds the encryption keys after go live, and whether you can decrypt your own archives without the provider and its licence.
- Test their compliance depth, because rules have to match your records of processing activities rather than folder names on a share.
Data protection and DLP - common questions
Answers for teams that are about to buy services from this category.
A data protection engagement combines five parts. Three of them put the records in order: an inventory, a classification and DLP rules watching the exit channels. Two guard the content itself: cryptography together with key handling, plus pseudonymisation of records used outside production. Many providers sell only some of those, most often the DLP product alone or the cryptography design alone. Spell the scope out in your request, otherwise quotes describe different work under one name.
GDPR mandates neither encryption nor DLP outright, and names encryption as an example of a measure appropriate to the risk. The practical effect is narrower than an exemption: whether a breach reaches the supervisory authority turns on the risk to people's rights, while records unreadable to an unauthorised person can remove the duty to inform the individuals themselves. For special category data and mobile devices, missing encryption is hard to defend.
The soundest test is a limited pilot on one department and one channel, priced separately from the main deployment. Judge it by what classification actually found in your own repositories, not by a demonstration on sample data. Ask which engineer will lead the delivery and how much of their time the schedule reserves for you.
Four things stay behind and stay useful: the classification report, the rule set with each rule explained in writing, the key management policy, and the breach handling procedure. The classification report earns its keep beyond DLP, since it points at records worth deleting and at permissions granted far too broadly. Wire the rules into your change process, so a new system or a new share never appears outside classification.
Failed rollouts usually start with blocking switched on across every channel at once, before any rule tuning. The consequence is predictable: false positives climb, teams press for more rules to be disabled, and disabled rules rarely come back. Buying licences ahead of classification belongs in the same group, because then the product price list defines the scope instead of how sensitive the records really are.
Classification and permission clean up are within reach of an internal team, while cryptography design and DLP rule tuning rarely land well without earlier deployments behind you. Switching on disk and mail encryption in tools you already own also stays in house. The line runs where a mistake costs access to your own records: the key model, the recovery procedure, and exceptions to the rules.
A staged deployment does not stop work, because the monitoring phase records events without blocking anything. Users only feel enforcement, which is why it goes live channel by channel and after the change has been announced. The real load on your side is handling exceptions right after each switch, so somebody needs time reserved for those requests. Scans of large repositories are scheduled away from peak hours to spare the file servers.
Four roles are needed: the administrator of mail and workstations, the owners of business processes, a data protection officer or whoever answers for compliance, and a decision maker who signs off on blocking. Process owners carry the most weight and get left out most often, because only they can say which outbound file is ordinary work. Without them the rules describe file structure instead of document flow.
Classification and rule tuning need access to content, so the provider will see document samples and, while triaging alerts, specific files and recipients. That access is bounded by a processing agreement, a named list of people on their side, and a rule that data never leaves your systems. Settle where the DLP console logs are kept and who reads them, since those logs alone reveal who sends what.
Liability towards the supervisory authority and towards affected individuals stays with the controller, which in this arrangement is usually your company, whichever tool failed. A contract can allocate financial consequences and describe the provider duties, but it does not transfer the controller role. That is why the commitments weigh more than penalty clauses: response time on an alert, the scope of rule maintenance, and help with scoping the breach.
Not sure which provider fits?
Describe what you need. An enquiry sent from here reaches us only. To reach a provider, send it from the profile of a data protection company you pick.
You do not need to know the exact category. Describing the problem is enough.
Cybersecurity service categories
Browse the full list of cybersecurity specialisations available in the directory and find the right partner for your organisation.
Infrastructure security covers the rollout and day-to-day running of endpoint, identity and network defences: EDR, MFA, access control and segmentation. The directory lists providers who run such projects from inventory to handover.
A penetration test is an authorised attack on your own system that shows which flaws an intruder would actually use. Compare providers testing web and mobile apps, networks and source code.
GRC and compliance work turns security into a managed system: risk analysis, policies, continuity planning and the evidence an auditor asks for. Browse the providers who run those projects in Poland.
Security awareness programmes, phishing simulations and certification courses for IT staff - from spotting a fake payment request to exam preparation. Compare training providers delivering in Poland.
OT/ICS security protects the plant network, PLC controllers and SCADA stations from incidents that stop production. See providers who work on the shop floor without shutting the line down.
Cloud security means reviewing and tightening how AWS, Azure and GCP accounts are set up: identity, permissions, encryption, containers and deployment pipelines. Browse Polish firms that examine your estate and help close what they find.
Data protection means inventory and classification of data sets, encryption, DLP and key management in a cloud KMS or an HSM. Compare providers that map where your records sit and cut the risk of them leaving the company.
Continuous security monitoring and incident detection: SOC as a Service, MDR, SIEM rollouts and SOAR automation. Find Polish providers that watch your logs around the clock and escalate real attacks.